Suppressed Evidence

From EvoWiki

(Redirected from Under-reporting the Facts)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is part of the EvoWiki encyclopedia of fallacies.

Browse: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Contents

Synonyms

  • Exclusion
  • Card Stacking
  • Cherry picking
  • Cover-up
  • Fallacy of Exclusion
  • Fallacy of Slanting
  • Ignoring the Counterevidence
  • Incomplete Evidence
  • Observational Selection
  • One-Sided Assessment
  • One-Sidedness
  • Slanting
  • Slanting Fallacy
  • Stacking the Deck
  • Concealed Evidence

Explanation

When presenting a case, omitting important evidence that would hurt one's own case.

In the case of debating Creationism vs. Evolution. A common suppressed evidence argument would be "Evolution is racist". This is obviously ignoring the evidence that many (in fact most) racist groups who exist in America in the past and today are everything but evolutionist. Most believe in the Bible as well as creationism. One only needs to look around to see, Ku Klux Klan, Christian Identity, are among the most famous who believe in the statement and claim 'God created races separately' which is actually contradictory to Biblical scriptures. With that said, racism is more seen in creation than in evolution, by simply denying people of different skin color have common ancestor, one is likely racist. The claim also ignores the fact that modern biologists argue that, other than skin colour, "race" is not a valid biological concept.

On the other hand, there is the example of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, who was staunch believer in evolution (certainly not a "creationist") and a proponent of eugenics (the science of creating and engineering the evolution of man through breeding the strong and desirable and eliminating the misfits and the weak). In relating the strategy to succeed with her "Negro Project", she stated (in a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, December 10, 1939), "we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

This is not to say evolution is now perfect because creationism is racist too (Tu Quoque). But just to point out the fact evolution is misused by some in racist actions, does not mean it is inherently racist, not to mention refute the theory of evolution.

Demarcation

You do not commit this fallacy if you:

  • omit minor evidence which is irrelevant to your point. To call this "suppressing evidence" would be quibbling.
  • omit "counterevidence" that has already been falsified. To call this "suppressing evidence" would be suppressing evidence, namely the fact that the counterevidence has already been refuted. Creationists do this a lot.

Countermeasure

Pointing out the omitted evidence.

Category

Subfallacies

External Links

  • Fallacy Files [1]
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [2]
  • Agnosticism/Atheism [3]
  • Stephen Downes [4]
  • Global Tester [5] (Card Stacking)
  • Wikipedia [6]

Examples in creationist arguments

Personal tools