There are gaps between plant-animal

From EvoWiki

Contents 1 Claim 2 Source 3 Responses 4 Fallacies contained in this claim 5 Related claims 6 See Also 7 Acknowledgments

Claim

There are gaps between plant-animal.

Source

• add source

Responses

1. Plants did not evolve from animals and animals did not evolve from plants. This "gap" is meaningless.
2. Plants and animals evolved separately from protists. Choanoflagellates fill the protist-animal "gap," with green algae and mastigophoran flagellates filling that protist-plant "gap".
3. add more responses

Fallacies contained in this claim

• add fallacies

Related claims

• There are gaps between invertebrate-vertebrate
• There are gaps between fish-amphibian
• There are gaps between amphibian-reptile
• There are no fossil ancestors of dinosaurs
• There are gaps between reptile-bird
• There are gaps between reptile-mammal
• There are gaps between land mammals and whales
• Horse fossils don't show evolution
• There are no fossil giraffes with shorter necks
• There are no fossil ancestors of monkeys
• Arthropods arose suddenly
• There are no fossil ancestors of insects
• There are no fossil ancestors of plants

See Also

• Why is Creationism not a Scientific Theory?
• Theory of Evolution

Acknowledgments