The Bible must be accurate because archaeology supports it

From EvoWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Claim

Archaeology supports the accuracy of the Bible.

Source

Responses

  1. It is true that some bits of the Bible have indeed been confirmed by modern archaeological research. It is also true that some bits of Homer's Iliad and Odyssey have been confirmed by modern archaeological research. If the bits of the Bible which have been confirmed are reason to believe that all the Bible (including the bits about the Judeo-Christian God) is accurate, the bits of the Iliad and Odyssey which have been confirmed are, by that same reasoning, reason to believe that all of the Iliad and Odyssey (including the bits about the Greek pantheon) are accurate.
  2. The Harry Potter series takes place in England. England is real, therefore Harry Potter is real.
  3. Bradbury's Martian Chronicles take place on Mars. Mars is real, therefore the Martian Chronicles are accurate, therefore Martians are real.
  4. add more responses

Fallacies contained in this claim

External Links

  • Lazare, Daniel, 2002 (Mar.). False testament: archaeology refutes the Bible's claim to history. Harpers [1]

References

  1. Humphreys, Kenneth, 2003. Nazareth -- The Town that Theology Built. [2]
  2. Lazare, 2002. (see above)

Further Reading

  • Miller, Laura, 2001 (7 Feb.). King David was a nebbish. Salon.com, [3]
  • Silberman, Neil, and Israel Finkelstein, 2001. The Bible Unearthed, Free Press.
  • BAR 22:4 (1996), pp. 30-39 & 62-63; concluded in BAR 22:5 (1996), pp. 30-37 & 74-77.,
  • J. J. Bimson & D. Livingstone: Redating the Exodus in BAR 13:5 (1987), pp. 40-53.
  • P.R. S. Moorey, A Century of Biblical Archaeology, Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991

Related claims

Acknowledgments

Personal tools