Talk:The Great Dinosaur Mystery Solved! Part 5

From EvoWiki

I appreciate the thought, but I didn't write the page where you got the term "Bible Blinkers" from. The author is correctly given at the top of the page, John Stear. He didn't invent the phrase either (or, at least, isn't the first person to invent it), as I've seen it bandied about since I started online debates back in '99. --Suttkus 22:00, 9 May 2006 (BST)

I've checked. You're right, Suttkus. The article isn't written by you. My mistake.--Crazyharp81602 22:56, 9 May 2006 (BST)

micro vs. macro evolution

YEC's accept evolution within a species. But not the idea that species evolve into other species. So when you say Ham endorses evolution, you are misrepresenting him(intentionally?)

SW--64.136.26.228 18:40, 23 July 2006 (BST)

It tends to be very hard to intentionally misrepresent someone who routinely uses pretzel logic, like Ken Ham. Mr Ham accepts microevolution, but, he not only denies that macroevolution occurs, or has occurred: he also believes that all living things descended from their ancestral "kind" within the last 4 thousand years. Essentially, he only believes what he wants to believe, so long as it reinforces his own interpretation of the Book of Genesis. As such, no, we are not intentionally misrepresenting him, we are merely pointing out the canyon-like holes in his logic.--Mr A. 19:24, 23 July 2006 (BST)