Talk:ResearchID.org
From EvoWiki
Let's all give researchid.org a big wiki welcome.
We really look forward to reading some real Praxis: "Here at ResearchID.org, we would like to produce great Theoria articles, so that we can also generate clear and precise Praxis articles." Are there any examples now of: "An application assigned as Praxis would be more concerned with empirical investigation or lab research" in ID.
Note Santorum Amendment does not carry force of law, a nice thing to confuse people with but not very sound basis for a court case.
Who got Dempski's bottle of single malt after Dover?
- Do they have any ideas for what kind of "praxis" articles might show up? I mean, I've been asking crea...*cough* IDers for some kind of practical experiment they might perform for years without a hint of success, just a list of ideas would be great! --Suttkus 12:06, 5 April 2006 (BST)
User:128.253.56.204 made their only contribution to EvoWiki by changing 'creationist' to 'intelligent design'. The problem with just asserting words does not make it so. 'intelligent design' is creationism, just as YEC myths or Hindu myths or TuleLake Great Turtle myths are. ID invokes a supernatural entity to create life - this is creationism by any reasonable definition. Frankly I think the ID folks are really a fraud because they're just trying to sneak Christian creationism into U.S. school under the guise of not-that-cleverly worded argument. At least the admitted creationists are honest; they stand up for what they believe in and are willing to fight directly against the Constitution, not try to sneak around it. So, 'machts nicht' to me what it gets called in this article, but at least you could have made it a link. If you have any connection to ResearchID.org we look forward to seeing any real research and hope that someone from ID someday has something real to report in a peer-reviewed science journal.
