Talk:Michael Behe

From EvoWiki

I don't understand how you can accept the observable maifestations of evolution (life) and not "molecular life". The observable, (life and evolution) is the result of molecular life. Maybe I don't understand what you mean by "molecular life." I, you and all organisms are the sum total of our molecules. Evolution has to be the result of evolution on the molecular level. How do you diferentiate them?

Martin Weiss

I guess you misunderstand "Talk:Michael Behe". Is means you talk about the article Michael Behe, not that you talk to Michael Behe himself. But maybe I misunderstand what you are trying to say. --tk (t) 10:44, 11 Apr 2005 (BST)

On January 28, 2002 Michael Behe said: "Since intelligent agents are the only entities known to be able to construct irreducibly complex systems, the biochemical systems are better explained as the result of deliberate intelligent design" I associate intelligence with simple, logic, to the essence kinda stuff. More E=mc² like i mean... Why do we need a lot of proteines to maintain the bloth casacade? Hehe, it looks more like drunk design... And common, the mousetrap? Genome DUPLICATIONS & VIRUSSES BEHE !!!Intelligence and complex (and i don't know how more complex irreducibly complex may be)are only standards to set by humans not science.

Given his testimony in Dover vs Kitzmiller, it's hard to understand what Behe actually believes and understands about science. Certainly, he doesn't know what peer review is, he finds it acceptable ignore scientific evidence that disagrees with his assertions, and he believes it is not worthwhile to test his own theories. --RonZ 23:22, 4 August 2006 (BST)