Talk:Ken Ham

From EvoWiki

I don't understand this. Why did you remove the "|Ham, Ken" part?

Now the list displayed in the category has Ken Ham under "K" instead of "H". --tk (t) 11:22, 3 April 2006 (BST)

Sorry, my mistake. I had correctly deduced the reason for |Ham, Ken, but did an experiment where I concluded (obviously incorrectly) it didn't actually do anything - still learning, thanks for the tip, it's fixed now (without reverting, to retain other changes)

Yuck, there are a lot of these, not all mine, so yet another cleanup project for me. --Dmill96 11:39, 3 April 2006 (BST)

Content

Excuse me, but how can you back up calling creationism "hate propoganda" and a "host of major falsehoods"? Is it "hate propoganda" simply because it blames society's ills on evolution? That sounds exactly like an relatavist: "You hate everyone who doesn't agree with you and you hate us because you're telling us we can't do whatever we want!" Jobob 17:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

How is blaming all evils on evolution not hate propaganda? It is a transparent attempt at avoiding evidence by Appeal to Emotion. If creationists had real scientific evidence, they wouldn't need to use such low tricks. (BTW, I never heard of any "relatavists" - probably you mean moral relativists - who say that. They sound really stupid.) --tk [[User_talk:Thomas_Kettenring|(t)]] 09:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

If Creationist Ken Ham does not engage in hate propaganda, then how doe you explain why he said, in his eulogy to Steve Irwin, that because Steve Irwin didn't repent for his sin of believing in evolutionary biology, he's burning in Hell now, or that the madman who shot those Amish girls in order to get revenge against God was because of "evolutionism?" If that isn't "hate propaganda", please tell me what it is.--Mr A. 16:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)