Talk:Instincts are too complex to have evolved

From EvoWiki

If the only response that evolutionists have is, "The creationists are using an argument from ignorance, therefore they're wrong and we're right," then they're in no better place than the creationists. This applies to all claims where all they evolutionists can say is, "That's an argument from ignorance." If you can't respond with evidence, then you're arguing from ignorance, too.

False. Evolution has lots of good arguments for it. Creationists have not one single good argument. They have lots of arguments that fail as soon as the are inspected closely though.

Of course someone can theoretically be right despite not having a single argument and depite showing his ignorance of logic and the subject at hand, but that's a pretty remote possibility. --tk (t) 11:43, 17 Nov 2005 (GMT)