Talk:Gluons don't exist since no one has seen them, so it must be God who holds the nucleus together

From EvoWiki

Creationist vandalism

You're emotionally defending evolution. The forementioned chick tract also says that "NO ONE EVER MEASURED THEM".

Now, for gluons to be considered scientifically proven, they have to be measured. We didn't know atoms were there, aye, we didn't say "well we can't see atoms but we know they're there".

This is what YOU'RE DOING WITH GLUONS. "Well I can't see them, but what a great chance to have a super comeback at God since "omg I can't see him either".

How is it logical to presume that a "hidden" (not measurable) force that keeps things together is this thing called "gluon". Illogical, emotional thinking.

This "omg we prove that gluons exist!" comeback is just as pathetic as trying to prove how the second law of thermodynamics doesn't contradict evolution because "the Earth is not a closed system".

Wake up! Maybe read that chick tract again to see how many lies evolution tells you? I don't know...

Oh, and if I was biased, bite me. This "anti-claimenator" website is biased towards atheism as well.

Someone wrote this on the article page instead of here where it belongs.

Response: You don't understand what Chick is saying and what is wrong with it. Chick wrongly claims that gluons have not been observed, but they have. From the wrong claim, he stupidly draws an invalid conclusion ("we neither observed A nor B, so B must be the right explanation"). And your bias is not a valid reason to dismiss your argument, it's just the reason you didn't notice the errors in it. --tk (t) 12:32, 3 April 2006 (BST)