Talk:Equivocation

From EvoWiki

A more general gloss on the fallacy of Equivocation would be preferable here to simply creating a tendentious and pointless closed loop reinforcing (?) the statements on the Creationism page. --Anon

Feel free to write it! --Steinsky 18:33, 8 Apr 2004 (BST)

Most of the fallacy pages are still empty because they are under construction. They are intended for linking to the Creationist claims. I intended to do that after the claims are linked to the fallacies, since that is more effective. (Then you just have to click "What links here", copy the content, and format a bit. If you do it in more than one step, you also have to compare what is already there.) On the other hand, this leads to the pages being useless for a long time. So, yes, you are right, maybe one should do that sooner.

A "more general gloss" can be found in the external link, but as Steinsky said, you can write more if you want. --Thomas Kettenring