Evolution doesn't explain language ability

From EvoWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Claim

Evolution does not explain the evolution of language ability.

Source

Responses

  1. Virtually all animals have the ability to communicate with each other, using all manner of methods, including pheromones, scents, sounds, scratches, and color-changes in different combinations depending on the species.
  2. Evolution explains language exactly the same way it explains everything else: mutations which contribute to a useful ability (such as language) are preserved by natural selection in organisms for whom such an ability enhances reproductive success. It is very easy to see how the language ability enhances the odds of survival and, thus, reproductive success.
  3. Language doesn't fossilise so the exact pathway taken by the evolution of language may not be discoverable after all this time; however several plausible pathways have been proposed.
  4. add more responses

Fallacies contained in this claim

External Links

Further Reading

  • Pinker, S., 1994. The Language Instinct. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Deacon, Terence W., 1998. The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain, W.W. Norton & Co.
  • Johansson, Sverker, 2002. The evolution of human language capacity. Master's Thesis, University of Lund. [3] (esp. pp. 65ff)
  • Tattersall, Ian, 2001 (Dec.). How we came to be human. Scientific American 285(6): 56-63. Excerpted from The Monkey in the Mirror, Harcourt, 2002.

Related claims

See Also

Acknowledgments

Personal tools