EvoWiki talk:Editorial philosophy

From EvoWiki

I would like to know what your editorial policies concerning peer review are. For instance, I was pointed to two articles on "pseudoscience" and "paradigm shifts" that demonstrate glaring ignorance of modern philosophy of science (and the references used are giveaways to anyone familiar with the philosophy of science). Do you have a philosopher of science reviewing those submissions?

Cheers.

We have no official editors: anybody and everybody is allowed to write pages, and anybody and everybody is allowed to correct people's articles. There are about 6 of us who regularly check through the recent changes for obvious mistakes, but we are not necessarily experts in the particular field, so we can't check every detail. More experts are always welcome, and it would be useful if people added themselves to this page so that experts in different fields could be contacted if anyone had a query about a specific topic. --Steinsky 15:08, 2 May 2004 (BST)