EvoWiki talk:About

From EvoWiki

Shouldn't the main page have a disclaimer that this is a pro evolution site for the purpose of discrediting other theories and advancing established evolutionary dogma? The article discussing protoavis is a very good example of opinion journalism, not scientific analysis.

Not when it's easy enough to remove any so-called "dogma" when and where it actually exists if at all, leaving just the scientific analysis. --RonZ 20:10, 18 August 2006 (BST)

If you want to do, feel free to add information from Creationist and Intelligent Design reports concerning the prehistoric organisms in this website, and otherwise amend the entries' opinion journalism style. Oh, wait, there are no such reports on prehistoric organisms, because Creationists and ID proponents find it very convenient to totally ignore the study of ancient organisms in favor of railing against "evolutionary dogma," whatever that is.--Mr A. 20:30, 18 August 2006 (BST)